مهندسی عمران فردوسی

مهندسی عمران فردوسی

ارزیابی تئوری رانکین در طراحی سازه‌های نگهبان خرپایی: یک مطالعه عددی بر توزیع فشار جانبی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
دانشکده عمران، دانشگاه یزد، یزد.
چکیده
طراحی متداول سازه‌های نگهبان خرپایی در عمل مهندسی، عمدتاً بر اساس تئوری فشار جانبی رانکین استوار است که اندرکنش واقعی خاک و سازه را در نظر نمی‌گیرد. این پژوهش با بهره‌گیری از مدل‌سازی عددی سه‌بعدی پیشرفته در نرم‌افزار FLAC3D، به مقایسه توزیع فشار جانبی واقعی با تئوری رانکین و ارزیابی پیامدهای آن بر طراحی اعضای سازه می‌پردازد. نتایج تحلیل‌های پارامتریک نشان می‌دهد که توزیع فشار جانبی به دلیل پدیده قوس‌زدگی (Arching) کاملاً غیرخطی بوده و در محل اتصالات خرپا متمرکز می‌شود. نیروی جانبی کل در گودهای کم‌عمق به‌مراتب بیشتر از پیش‌بینی تئوری رانکین است، اما این اختلاف با افزایش عمق کاهش می‌یابد. مهم‌تر آنکه، محل اثر نیروی برآیند به طور میانگین در 42/0 ارتفاع گود از کف گود قرار دارد که به شکل قابل‌توجهی بالاتر از فرض یک‌سوم ارتفاع گود در تئوری رانکین است. این یافته‌ها آشکار می‌سازد که طراحی سنتی منجر به طراحی غیراقتصادی برای شمع قائم و درعین‌حال، طراحی بالقوه غیر محافظه‌کارانه برای عضو کلیدی پشت‌بند می‌شود که این امر بر ضرورت بازنگری در رویکردهای طراحی فعلی تأکید دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Re-evaluation of Rankine's Theory in the Design of Truss Retaining Structures: A Numerical Study on Lateral Pressure Distribution

نویسندگان English

Amirreza Ghodrati
Mohammad Hazeghian
Department of Civil Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده English

The conventional design of truss retaining structures in engineering practice is predominantly based on Rankine's lateral earth pressure theory, which neglects the actual soil-structure interaction. This research utilizes advanced three-dimensional numerical modeling in FLAC3D to compare the actual lateral pressure distribution with Rankine's theory and to evaluate its consequences on the design of the structural members. The results of parametric analyses indicate that the lateral pressure distribution is highly non-linear due to the arching phenomenon, concentrating at the truss connection points. The total lateral force in shallow excavations is considerably greater than the predictions of Rankine's theory, though this difference diminishes with increasing depth. More importantly, the resultant force's point of application is, on average, at a height of 0.42H from the base, which is significantly higher than the 0.33H assumed in Rankine's theory. These findings reveal that the traditional design approach leads to an uneconomical design for the vertical pile while simultaneously resulting in a potentially unconservative design for the critical raker member, thereby underscoring the necessity of revising current design practices.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Truss Retaining Structure
Lateral Earth Pressure
Soil-Structure Interaction
Arching Effect
Rankine Theory
  1. Ashrafi, Principles and Foundations of Excavation and Guard Structures. Tehran, Iran: Bahineh Publications, 2014. (In Persian). [Online].
  2. Moradi, S. Zadkarim, and H. Katebi, “Field study of the effect of drilling type on tensile strength and creep behavior of soil nails in Tabriz Green Marl,” Journal of Ferdowsi Civil Engineering, pp. 47–60, 2017. (In Persian). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22067/civil.v29i2.46276
  3. Abdoli, H. Mehrnahad, and M. Hazeghian, “Numerical study of installation effect and inclination angle on the pullout capacity of helical multiple anchors on excavation support,” 2023. (In Persian). [Online]. Available: https://road.bhrc.ac.ir/article_153798.html?lang=en
  4. Hazeghian, “Proposing a design method for soil-nailed walls and comparing it with the conventional design method,” Journal of Ferdowsi Civil Engineering, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 37–52, 2022. (In Persian). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22067/jfcei.2022.76614.1142
  5. Bolouri Bazaz and M. Abdollahi, “An experimental investigation into the excavation using pile-anchorage system,” Journal of Ferdowsi Civil Engineering, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 79–96, 2018. (In Persian). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22067/civil.v31i4.63763
  6. J. M. Rankine, “On the stability of loose earth,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, no. 147, pp. 9–27, 1857. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/108608
  7. L. Bell, “The lateral pressure and resistance of clay and the supporting power of clay foundations,” in Minutes of the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1915. [Online].
  8. Shekarian, A. Ghanbari, and M. Makarchian, “Earth pressure on retaining walls with reinforced backfill,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), 2008. [Online].
  9. S. Song, J.-M. Yun, and B. Chae, “Lateral earth pressure acting on the anchored walls installed in cut slopes,” Journal of the Geological Society of London, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://media.geolsoc.org.uk/iaeg2006/PAPERS/IAEG_175.PDF
  10. Ö. Bilgin, “Numerical studies of anchored sheet pile wall behavior constructed in cut and fill conditions,” Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 399–407, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.01.002
  11. M. Hashash and A. J. Whittle, “Mechanisms of load transfer and arching for braced excavations in clay,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 187–197, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:3(187)
  12. Karlsrud and L. Andresen, “Loads on braced excavations in soft clay,” International Journal of Geomechanics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 107–113, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:2(107)
  13. A. Costa, J. L. Borges, and M. M. Fernandes, “Analysis of a braced excavation in soft soils considering the consolidation effect,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 617–629, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-007-9134-7
  14. Mohamadi Flavarjane, K. Barkhordari, and M. Hazeghian, “Numerical study of truss supported excavation considering combination of both vertical and lateral displacements,” in 1st International Conference on Civil, Architectural and Sustainable Green City, Hamedan, Iran, 2017. (In Persian). [Online].
  15. S. Emamzadeh, “Numerical analysis of inclined struts and truss structure in excavation stabilization based on the damage potential index (DPI),” Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, pp. 306–327, 2022. (In Persian). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2021.271828.2356
  16. Safarzadeh and F. Najafpour, “Investigation of the effect of deep excavation by the truss guard structure method on the settlement and the bearing capacity of the adjacent foundation,” in Second National Conference on Civil Engineering, Intelligent Development and Sustainable Systems, Gorgan, Iran, 2022. (In Persian). [Online]. Available: https://civilica.com/doc/1575884/
  17. Safarzadeh and S. Mehrifar, “Investigating the wall displacement of excavation in the truss guard structure system,” in Second National Conference on Civil Engineering, Intelligent Development and Sustainable Systems, Gorgan, Iran, 2022. (In Persian). [Online]. Available: https://civilica.com/doc/1575886/
  18. Alizade and A. Eslami Haghighat, “Investigating the efficiency of the design charts of the truss supporting systems by comparing the models of Mohr–Coulomb and hardening soil,” in 5th Iranian Conference on Geotechnical Engineering and 2nd International Conference on Earthquake and Seismic Geotechnical Engineering, 2023. (In Persian). [Online]. Available: https://en.civilica.com/doc/2061484/
  19. Pirmohammadi Alishah, M. Motalbian, and M. Mohammadrezaei, “Modeling deformation and design of truss retaining structures in multi-layered soil using an equivalent single-layer soil with the finite element method,” Civil and Project, vol. 7, no. 2, 2025. (In Persian). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22034/cpj.2025.508117.1347
  20. Itasca Consulting Group, FLAC3D – Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, Version 6.0. Minneapolis, MN, USA: Itasca Consulting Group, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020260
  21. Lees, Geotechnical Finite Element Analysis. London, U.K.: ICE Publishing, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1680/gfea.60876
  22. E. Bowles, Foundation Analysis and Design. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1988. [Online].
  23. P. Jamsawang, P. Voottipruex, P. Tanseng, P. Jongpradist, and D. T. Bergado, “Effectiveness of deep cement mixing walls with top-down construction for deep excavations in soft clay: Case study and 3D simulation,” Acta Geotechnica, vol. 14, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0660-7
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.